What makes Scientology work is the concept expressed by these datums:

Get The Preclear Through It
What Turns It On, Will Turn It Off
The Way Out Is The Way Through

A case could be considered to be that accumulation of things that the Being has run from. In other words – a case is those things that the Being cannot easily confront, both past and present. The only workable method of Scientology tech is to get the Being to confront and handle those things he runs from.

But, the dangerous auditor does quite the opposite – he allows the Being to escape.

The dangerous auditor defeats the datum that makes tech work – get the pc to confront it.

Allowing the pc to escape = the Being does not rise up the tone scale to freedom.

Thus the dangerous auditor not only sabotages case gain, but the entire Bridge too.

LRH tape lecture 29 August 1961 Basics of Auditing:

“Now let’s take up something… under the heading of “escape” as a philosophy.”

“You’ll get the auditor letting the pc escape; he wants the pc to escape, because this is the auditor’s modus operandi of handling situations. And this is as wrongheaded as you could get, because the only way a pc will ever get Clear is by turning around and fighting down the devils that pursue him.”

“If a Scientologist has never been through an engram, if a Scientologist has never been stuck on the track, if a Scientologist has never seen ridges or any of the other mental phenomena, it is because his basic philosophy in life is escape.”

“Of course, if he’s never seen an engram, what is he trying to do? He’s trying to escape from engrams. So he escapes so hard from engrams that he sees a little flick of a picture and he’s away, man, he’s away. There’s a little twitch of a somatic and phew! He’s gone. Why?

His basic philosophy is that if you can run fast enough you never get bit. So, of course, he doesn’t have what we call case reality, because of course he’s running from his case. His basic philosophy is “The best way to handle a case is get out of it,” so that’s all he ever does with the pc: takes the pc out of his case.”

“It is pure kindness. This auditor will find the pc getting interiorized a little bit and he’ll know that this is the wrong thing to do. So he will take the pc’s attention out of session. Some of them do it very flagrantly and some of them do it very pleasantly. One of the ways of doing it is to change the process.”

“Pc shows the slightest inkling of digging into it in the bank and the auditor pulls him out. The auditor is selling him freedom. At what cost? The cost of never getting Clear.”

“The auditor is saying, “Escape, escape, escape.” The auditor is actually saying, “Don’t confront it, don’t confront it, don’t confront it.” The processes he’s running are saying, “Confront it, confront it, confront it,” don’t you see?”

“You cannot see engrams while you’re running from them.

Let’s take a model engram that this person is in… And they’ve got him tied to a post and he’s being whipped. So he cannot leave that post, so he fixes his attention on a section of sky and says, “It isn’t happening.” That’s escape, isn’t it? So what does he find when he gets into that engram? He finds an invisibility called sky. He doesn’t find any whiplashes, he doesn’t find any post, he doesn’t find anything – he finds a section of sky. That is the final mechanism: escape.

Now, he escapes mentally. He doesn’t just run away; he escapes mentally. Don’t you see? All right. So that worked; he didn’t feel them after that.”

“So he’s being tortured on the rack – ah! he fools them all: He goes unconscious; he can’t feel it anymore. We don’t have, then, an engram of the rack; we have a period of unconsciousness. You see that? He’s actually in the incident, but he’s only unconscious.”

“Escape mentally, escape mentally by forgetting it; escape mentally by looking at nothing; Escape mentally by saying it isn’t there, you know? – the various mechanisms of not-is.”

“But the only philosophy that works in Scientology is “confront it.”

“And he isn’t being vicious, he isn’t trying to cut the pc to pieces. He knows what’s best for the pc: Get out of there, man! Not even, “get rid of it,” just “Get out of there.” Pc starts to look a little bit indrawn, go into session, the auditor will pull him out every time.”

“No matter how kind this auditor appears, this auditor is not safe as an auditor. Why? Because this auditor practices escape.”

“I think you will find this is the winning card. And if you look this over and you follow some part of this and you get an understanding of this, why I think you will get some fantastic auditing gains, and your days of loses will simply be in the long-distant past.”

- - - - - End of quotes from LRH tape - - - - -

When I take a look at the behavior of the leaders of the “Freezone” – I see nothing but a bunch of by-passed cases. These leaders have been practicing “Scientology” for decades. Yet they and their followers are still dramatizing case phenomena that they should have flattened decades ago - such as service facsimiles, justification of overts, etc.

Now how that happens is they are dangerous auditors who allow themselves and their followers to escape from, rather than confront, their cases. The details of this follows:

Let’s start with Rons Org terminals…

Excalibur is the name of Rons Org OT 8. The mental mechanism being handled on Excalibur is called plugs and stacks – aka as NOTs case inside the Church.

In the Rons Org materials, Captain Bill Robertson states the end phenomena for handling a plug or stack is a floating tone arm (FTA). But the current leaders of RO don’t do that.

The current leaders of RO have been known to state that a mere F/N is an acceptable end phenomena for a plug or stack.

After Captain Bill departed several issues have come out stating that an F/N is an end phenomena for a plug or stack. In the United States, Marianne Hagen takes it a step further by having a list of questions to check – if those don’t read that is the end phenomena, according to her.

So, do Rons Org terminals get themselves and others to really confront and handle their Excalibur case to a proper end phenomena? Nope – they allow themselves and others to escape. And that leaves them with by-passed Excalibur case and that means they are falsely attesting to levels they have not honestly attained.

And as they continue this philosophy of escape on up the bridge, they keep granting themselves certificates for levels not honestly attained and that’s how you get people declaring themselves OT 40 – who do not have the tone level, traits and abilities of an Operating Thetan.

And that is an overt on all – people then reach a false conclusion that tech does not work. No, in the hands of a dangerous auditor who practices escape – it does not work.

Some months ago, we had four RO terminals from Europe at our house for a week. During their visit we discovered some technical errors on their part. I do not have a problem with auditors making technical errors, as long as they accept correction. But, they refused correction – which says that their ethics are out – when tech won’t go in, ethics are out.

Misapplication of tech sabotages case gain. Any auditor refusing correction has this altered importance - my image is more important than the pc’s case gain. When they refuse correction it means they are intentionally misapplying tech and intentionally sabotaging case gain. Anyone who would do that is either insane or an enemy agent.

Instead of accepting correction – these RO terminals acted the same way as the SPs inside the Church acted when we found them guilty of out tech. They applied the Fair Game PL and attacked us with a black propaganda campaign.

That says a lot about them and the other Freezone practitioners who joined together in a black propaganda campaign against us. They have proven themselves to not be actual Scientologists by doing so. They are false Scientologists practicing reverse Scientology.

The reason is - Native State is ultimate truth. Actual Scientology moves a person up the tone scale towards Native State (Truth). Peddling lies moves one down the down scale, away from Native State, so it is reverse Scientology.

Anyway, shortly after these RO terminals left our house, LRH gave me a message that the people running RO are a bunch of know-bests who do not recognize source. He said that Rons Org did not deserve its name anymore because they are now off-source. My reply to him was “I’m sure you know what you are talking about, but I do not have any data on that to make it my reality.” Shortly after that, they refused correction and applied Fair Game to us, just like the Church did – and now I know what Ron was talking about.

Then we have such people as Alan Walter who is running a deprogramming operation. He and his followers are ex-Scientologists who consider the tech to be brainwashing. Ralph Hilton supports both of these suppressives - Alan Walter and David Miscavige.

The point is this – each one of these “Freezone” leaders is involved in a gross out ethics situation and they do not sit themselves down and apply ethics to themselves to handle it. Instead – they allow themselves to escape.

By their suppressive actions and inactions to destroy the workability of the tech – the leaders of the so-called “Freezone” have made themselves into agents of the Global Enslavers. As such, they are in a condition of enemy.

The “Freezone” has the same problem as the Church. It has been infiltrated by agents of the Global Enslavers and they have intentionally misapplied the subject of Scientology – thus assisting the purpose of sabotaging case gain so as to prevent anyone going OT.

Now, none of this is to say that people in the Church or the Freezone do not make any case gain. I think it speaks well of the tech that despite all of the sabotaging, people still manage to get some case gains. But, do not jump to the false conclusion that just because these enemy agents inside the Church or the Freezone do some things right, that means they are well-intentioned good guys who do everything right.

No, doing some things right is part of their cover. They are hoping you will fall for their cover that they are good guys doing things right. That way, you will trust them when they sabotage the Upper Bridge OT levels, and do what they say – with the disastrous result of you do not get to OT. Face the fact that they have not made themselves an OT and are not about to make you one either - if you do what they say that opposes LRH issues.

So, the whole message here is this:

Stay away from the dangerous auditors of the Freezone who practice escape.

They do not confront their own case and they will not get you to confront yours.

That fact undermines what makes tech work – get the Being to confront it.

And that fact not only sabotages case gain – but sabotages the entire Bridge as well.

Thus the Freezone is just a bunch of people with by-passed cases, and false titles.

As I said, these leaders of the “Freezone” have been in Scientology for decades. Some people falsely assume that makes them authorities on the subject of Scientology. No it does not. In one of the study tapes Ron says the man who is an authority on any given subject is the man who can get the expected results with that subject. The record shows these leaders do not get the expected result with the subject of Scientology and therefore they are not authorities on the subject.

As a result of the above – anyone who really wants to go up the Bridge should avoid the Church and the Freezone like the plague. The way to really do the Bridge today is – get yourself an e-meter and unaltered LRH issues and start your own little group where you live and co-audit each other. That way you can properly apply the subject of Scientology without the harmful influence of enemy agents - and thereby achieve the proper result of actually going up the tone scale to freedom.

If there is no FTA on handling a plug or a stack – that means there is some technical error on the case that must be found and handled. The case needs to have a review session to find and handle the by-passed charge. A by-passed charge list would be assessed and the reading items handled, either by the solo auditor or a review auditor.

And that by-passed charge list should contain a line about having a personal out ethics situation in life that needs to be addressed and handled. It should also have a line about lower grades left unflat. It should also have lines about auditor incompetence – meaning something is out with Auditor Beingness and Auditor errors due to MUs on procedure.

The end phenomena for the by-passed charge list is a FTA on the plug or stack.

1. In Ethics
2. Lower Bridge case fully handled
3. Competent auditor

Before allowing someone onto Excalibur or NOTs – check for the following:

1. Out ethics – use Ethics tech and FPRD as needed
2. Unflat lower Bridge – Apply HCOB 30 June 1971 Expanded Green Form GF 40XRF
3. Incompetent auditor – cram and train as needed

The above prerequisites are an advice from Ron communicated on 16 April 2002